Construction Audit

Construction audit services that catch the leak while the job is still open.

We encode the audit rules — committed costs against the subcontract, change-order pricing, pay-app math, retention, insurance and license terms — into a continuous AI audit that flags leakage before the check is cut.

  • AI implementation services
  • Continuous audit across every open job
  • Your contract rules, encoded
  • Fixed fee — no percentage of recovery

Built with the leading AI platforms

NVIDIAAnthropic
Peter Enestrom, founder of Zaigo

Led by Peter Enestrom and the Zaigo AI & engineering team

YaleColumbia UniversityMicrosoft

The broken Friday

The pay app clears. The contract never got consulted.

From project executives and controllers we have sat with: GCs, specialty subs, and PE-backed services businesses between $10M and $100M — dozens of open jobs, and nobody who can re-check every pay app against the contract.

  • Committed costs drift from the contract

    The subcontract sets the rates; the pay apps arrive with different ones. Scope lines creep, unit prices wander from the executed agreement, and checking means opening the contract PDF next to every continuation sheet — which is to say, eventually.

  • Pay-app math nobody re-checks

    Prior applications rolled forward wrong, stored materials billed without evidence, retainage computed on the wrong base. The continuation sheet runs forty lines, and the reviewer has six more waiting.

  • Change orders priced off-contract

    The contract caps the markup on change-order work — labor, material, and equipment each with their own rate. Pricing happens from memory, and the signed change order becomes the new truth nobody goes back to audit.

  • Retention tracked in a side spreadsheet

    Release conditions differ per contract and nobody checks them systematically. Retention goes out early to a friendly sub, or sits uncollected at closeout while someone reconstructs the job’s history by hand.

  • The insurance drawer nobody re-opens

    The sub’s certificate of insurance was current at contract signing. Eight months into the job it isn’t — lapsed licenses, missing endorsements, additional-insured wording — and the audit trail is a filing cabinet.

What manual costs

The leakage is a line item, not a feeling — and it clears with the pay app.

The scale of the contractor organizations this manual checking holds together. Your numbers will differ — the two-week audit puts figures on yours before anything gets built.

$10M–$100MRevenue range of the GCs and specialty subs checking pay apps against the contract by hand
40–50%Field accuracy of legacy OCR on the emailed PDFs pay apps and waivers arrive as
$100M+Specialty contractor whose change-order pricing rules lived in one person’s head

From anonymized engagements — general contracting, specialty trades, PE-backed field services

How it works

We encode your audit rules.

No new system for your team to learn. The rules your best project executive carries in their head become the checks every pay app runs under.

  1. 01

    Map the audit rules

    We write down every rule a pay app gets judged by: committed costs against the subcontract, change-order markup caps, retention terms, stored-materials evidence, insurance and license requirements. Tribal knowledge becomes a rule set — yours to keep.

    Weeks 1–2
  2. 02

    Encode the audit

    Every pay application, change order, and compliance document gets read and checked against your rules, across every open job, before payment runs. Violations land in a review queue — your team approves exceptions, not every pay app.

    Weeks 3–8
  3. 03

    Run it every cycle

    The audit keeps pace with the billing calendar: over-billing flagged before the check is cut, retention released on the contract’s schedule, a variance report your controller actually reads.

    Every billing cycle
Not another firm

A construction audit tells you what you lost. Encoded rules stop this month’s pay app.

The CPA firms auditing contractors today sell a retrospective project audit: one closed job, sampled transactions, a findings report months after the money left, billed by the hour. Construction auditing in that model tells you what you lost — and leaves the process that leaked it exactly as it found it.

We are not construction auditors in that sense. We encode the audit rules themselves — your subcontracts, your owner contracts, your retention and compliance terms — into a continuous AI audit inside the systems you already run. Every pay app checked, every open job, fixed fee, no percentage of recovery.

Peter Enestrom, founder of Zaigo
Who builds it

Led by Peter Enestrom.

Co-Founder — leads AI & Engineering

Pete Enestrom

Every engagement is led personally by Pete, working with the Zaigo AI & engineering team from the two-week audit through the production handover. The person who scopes the work is the person who builds it.

Education
Yale & ColumbiaGraduate
Background
Microsoft & IntelFormer
Experience
Exited FounderVenture-Backed

Background

Questions

Asked by project executives and controllers.

The straight answers, before you book anything.

What’s holding your business back?

A workflow ready for automation. An AI product you want to build. A problem that has sat on the roadmap for years. Let’s talk about what it would take to solve it.

Talk to Zaigo