Equipment Tracking

The equipment tracker spreadsheet that reconciles itself.

Assets under $2,500 never reach the ERP, so the truth lives in a spreadsheet — we encode one ID per asset and reconcile your existing systems.

  • AI implementation services
  • One asset, one ID — enforced at intake
  • Your exceptions, encoded
  • No trackers, no migration

Built with the leading AI platforms

NVIDIAAnthropic
Peter Enestrom, founder of Zaigo

Led by Peter Enestrom and the Zaigo AI & engineering team

YaleColumbia UniversityMicrosoft

The broken Friday

Three systems. None of them agree on what you own.

From the ops managers and controllers we have sat with: industrial field-services, equipment rental, and site-work contractors running fleets of 700 units and up — multi-branch operators where Business Central holds the books and a hand-maintained spreadsheet holds the truth.

  • Four numbers for the same machine

    Fixed assets says one thing, resources another, the spreadsheet a third, the physical label a fourth — and every report starts with an argument about which is right.

  • Hand-written IDs accounting has to guess

    Field guys write shorthand on delivery tickets — “cm72-y123” — and accounting guesses what it refers to. The guess becomes the record.

  • The $2,500 hole in the ERP

    A $2K instrument lives in an Excel tracker, not the ERP — nothing under the threshold was ever entered. The most walkable assets are what the system can’t see.

  • Red and green tags as the real system of record

    Inspection tags on the equipment carry more truth than any database. Rental fleet availability and pipeline shortfalls get forecast by hand, off what someone remembers in the yard.

  • “Where are these pumps right now?”

    The decaying spreadsheet, the ERP’s fixed-asset module, and the field app each give a different answer. One client nearly hired someone just to reconcile the lists by hand.

  • The spreadsheet between the books and the yard

    The books and the equipment don’t talk to each other — Business Central knows what you bought, the yard knows what you have, and between them sits a tracker nobody trusts. Ask where a unit is, or whether it’s working, and the answer is just guesswork.

  • The one-time tie-out that decays

    One multi-branch ops leader ran the reconciliation himself with an AI tool: three and a half hours, 764 items matched across three systems. It proved three lists should be one — and that a hand-run tie-out decays the week after, when the lists drift apart again.

What manual costs

The untracked fleet is a line item, not a feeling.

What we have found inside fleet-heavy field operations. Your numbers will differ — the initial reconciliation puts figures on yours before anything gets built.

$2,500The line below which assets never enter the ERP — and vanish from the record
4Equipment numbers per asset, across fixed assets, resources, spreadsheet, and label
700+Units in the fleets these conflicting lists try to describe

From anonymized engagements — multi-branch field-services, equipment-rental, and site-work operators on Business Central and spreadsheets

How it works

Equipment check in check out software, encoded at the yard gate.

No new system for your team to learn. One asset, one ID, enforced at intake — the rule everything else depends on. Check-out and check-in are where the record breaks: equipment leaves the yard, and the list stops matching reality until someone walks it. Our AI agents tie every departure to a job and a custodian at that point, and close the loop when the unit comes back — inside the systems you already run, not another app.

  1. 01

    Reconcile the lists once

    We run a one-time field audit and write explicit match rules — delivery-ticket shorthand to fixed-asset lines, rental units to register rows — collapsing three lists into one register.

    Weeks 1–3
  2. 02

    Encode identity at intake

    Every asset gets one ID before it reaches the field — no ID, no dispatch. New equipment enters the register the day it arrives, whatever it cost.

    Weeks 3–8
  3. 03

    Reconcile continuously

    The register checks itself against the ERP and field app. Mismatches surface as a weekly exception list — a pump in the wrong yard — not at audit time.

    Ongoing
Not another tool

An equipment tracking system, built on the systems you already own.

GPS and telematics vendors want hardware on every asset, priced per unit per month. Asset-management software wants a migration — and its demo assumes clean data, not four numbering systems and a spreadsheet nobody trusts.

We are neither. We encode asset identity and reconciliation rules on the systems you already own — one ID per thing, enforced at intake. Our AI reads the tickets and lists against them; exceptions surface weekly. Nobody sells that, so it has to be built.

Every product ranking for equipment tracking software assumes a clean start: one fleet, one app, one list. None of them reconcile a field app, a fixed-asset register, and a rental resource list into one governed master equipment list — least of all inside Business Central, next to the spreadsheets a multi-branch operation actually runs on. That reconciliation is the build: AI agents in your cloud, running your match rules, with only the exceptions routed to your people.

Peter Enestrom, founder of Zaigo
Who builds it

Led by Peter Enestrom.

Co-Founder — leads AI & Engineering

Pete Enestrom

Every engagement is led personally by Pete, working with the Zaigo AI & engineering team from the two-week audit through the production handover. The person who scopes the work is the person who builds it.

Education
Yale & ColumbiaGraduate
Background
Microsoft & IntelFormer
Experience
Exited FounderVenture-Backed

Background

Questions

Asked by ops managers and controllers.

The straight answers, before you book anything.

What’s holding your business back?

A workflow ready for automation. An AI product you want to build. A problem that has sat on the roadmap for years. Let’s talk about what it would take to solve it.

Talk to Zaigo